Cases 21 - 30 of 165
Boyle v. Starbucks Corporation
as 1:2021cv06011
Plaintiff:
Brie Boyle and Brian Boyle
Defendant:
Starbucks Corporation and Starbucks Coffee Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Troupe v. Martinez et al
as 2:2021cv01176
Plaintiff:
Anthony L Troupe
Defendant:
Judge Maureen Martinez, Judge Timothy Boyle and Commissioner Alice A Rudebusch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Westport Insurance Corporatio v. Dayle Boyle
as 21-2678
Plaintiff / Appellee:
WESTPORT INSURANCE CORPORATION
Defendant / Appellant:
DAYLE BOYLE
Boyle v. L-3 Communications Corporation et al
as 1:2021cv02136
Defendant:
L-3 Communications Corporation, National Union Fire Insurance Company, American International Group and others
Plaintiff:
Pauline Boyle
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Ramirez, Felix v. Wisconsin Masons Welfare Fund et al
as 3:2021cv00101
Defendant:
Matt Quasius, William Bonlender, Wisconsin Masons Welfare Fund and others
Plaintiff:
Felix Ramirez
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1109
Turner v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2021cv00704
Defendant:
Bryan Vielman, Curtis Weathersby, Andrew Khalifeh and others
Plaintiff:
Dominique Turner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
USA v. Gary Boyle
as 21-1093
Defendant / Appellant:
GARY L. BOYLE
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Burnette v. Schmaling et al
as 2:2020cv01792
Defendant:
Patricia Hanson, Christopher Schmaling, Wynne Laufenberg and others
Plaintiff:
Samuel Burnette
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Westport Insurance Corporation v. Sycamore Community Unit School District #427 et al
as 1:2020cv07081
Defendant:
Sycamore Community Unit School District #427, Dustin Rudy and Dayle Boyle
Plaintiff:
Westport Insurance Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ramirez, Gabriel v. State of Wisconsin, Dane County et al
as 3:2020cv01027
Defendant:
Deputy Zachary A. Sween, Deputy Lacey M. Kranski, B. Wiersma and others
Plaintiff:
Gabriel G. Ramirez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
