Cases 21 - 30 of 48
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00986
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Martell Brownlee v. James Zenk, et al
as 17-3461
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARTELL BROWNLEE
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES ZENK, TODD SHEFFLER, ROBERT FISHEL and others
Brownlee v. The National Collegiate Athletic Association et al
as 1:2017cv03974
Plaintiff:
Lance Brownlee
Defendant:
National Collegiate Athletic Association and Western Athletic Conference
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BROWNLEE v. THE NATIONAL COLLEGIATE ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION et al
as 1:2017cv00831
Plaintiff:
LANCE BROWNLEE
Defendant:
NATIONAL COLLEGIATE ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION and WESTERN ATHLETIC CONFERENCE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Brownlee v. Zenk et al
as 1:2016cv01192
Defendant:
. Zenk, Sheffler, Fishel and others
Plaintiff:
Martell Brownlee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brownlee v. Zenk et al
as 3:2016cv03126
Plaintiff:
Martell Brownlee
Defendant:
. Zenk, Sheffler, Fishel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 16-2005
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
CORBIN et al v. REVERE PLASTICS SYSTEMS, LLC
as 4:2016cv00038
Plaintiff:
DAVRON BROWNLEE, ELEXIUS CORBIN and DOMINIQUE DURRETT
Defendant:
REVERE PLASTICS SYSTEMS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Brownlee et al v. Combe Incorporated et al
as 3:2016cv00228
Plaintiff:
Renoldo Brownlee , Michael Caballero , Ronald Chamberlain and others
Defendant:
Combe Incorporated , Combe Products, Inc. , Combe Laboratories, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Brownlee v. Auto Exchange, The et al
as 1:2016cv02475
Plaintiff:
Johnny Brownlee
Defendant:
The Auto Exchange Inc. and Larry J Fenzau
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
