Cases 21 - 30 of 114
HINES v. LOCKETT et al
as 2:2012cv00180
Defendant:
J. BIEGHLEY, JASTILLANO, KUPSKA and others
Plaintiff:
CRAIG N. HINES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
BLANCHARD v. LOCKETT
as 2:2012cv00149
Petitioner:
RAY BLANCHARD
Respondent:
CHARLES LOCKETT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
BOOKER v. ISEMAN et al
as 2:2012cv00155
Defendant:
JULIE BEIGHLEY, ISEMAN, CHARLES LOCKETT and others
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH BOOKER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
KENEMORE v. LOCKETT
as 2:2012cv00140
Petitioner:
LAWERNCE D KENEMORE, JR
Warden:
CHARLES LOCKETT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
MOON v. LOCKETT et al
as 1:2012cv00771
Defendant:
OFFICER BASINGER, J. BEIGHLEY, OFFICER BETTS and others
Plaintiff:
DARNELL WESLEY MOON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
BARTELHO v. LOCKETT
as 2:2012cv00139
Petitioner:
THOMAS J. BARTELHO
Respondent:
CHARLES LOCKETT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
BARTELHO v. LOCKETT
as 2:2012cv00129
Petitioner:
THOMAS J. BARTELHO
Respondent:
CHARLES LOCKETT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
WRIGHT v. LOCKETT et al
as 2:2012cv00096
Defendant:
D. BURKS, J. CRUZ, CAPTAIN JOYNER and others
Plaintiff:
PAUL WRIGHT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
HINES v. LOCKETT et al
as 2:2012cv00091
Defendant:
J. BIEGHLEY, ALEX JASTILLANO, WARDEN CHARLES LOCKETT and others
Plaintiff:
CRAIG N. HINES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
WEBSTER v. LOCKETT
as 2:2012cv00086
Respondent:
CHARLES LOCKETT
Petitioner:
BRUCE CARNEIL WEBSTER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
