Cases 21 - 30 of 44
Soto et al v. Aamco Transmissions, Inc et al
as 3:2014cv01287
Plaintiff:
Gustavo Soto and Thomas W. Furlong, Jr
Defendant:
Aamco Transmissions, Inc, American Driveline Systems, Inc, Bret Bero and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Cleatus Furlong v. Richard Brown
as 14-2963
Petitioner - Appellant:
CLEATUS FURLONG
Respondent - Appellee:
RICHARD BROWN
Cleatus Furlong v. Richard Brown
as 14-2923
Petitioner - Appellant:
CLEATUS FURLONG
Respondent - Appellee:
RICHARD BROWN
Garfield v. Furlong et al
as 3:2014cv00937
Plaintiff:
John Garfield
Defendant:
Dennis Furlong, Nick Nelley and Dr Larson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FURLONG v. BROWN et al
as 2:2014cv00235
Defendant:
MICHAEL BARNES, DICK BROWN, SARAH CHAPMAN and others
Plaintiff:
CLEATUS FURLONG
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alvarado v. Illinois Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2014cv00832
Plaintiff:
Matthew Alvarado
Defendant:
S.A. Godinez, Wexford Health Sources, Dr. Furlong and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Montileone et al v. Aamco Transmissions, Inc et al
as 3:2013cv01217
Plaintiff:
Timothy Montileone , Rick A Firmand , Thomas W Furlong, Jr and others
Defendant:
Aamco Transmissions, Inc, American Capital, LTD, American Driveline Systems, Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Furlong v. Bayer Corporation et al
as 3:2013cv10769
Plaintiff:
Katherine Furlong
Defendant:
Bayer Corporation, Bayer Pharmaceuticals Corporation, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
FURLONG v. BROWN
as 2:2013cv00228
Respondent:
DICK BROWN
Petitioner:
CLEATUS FURLONG
Miscellaneou:
WVCF (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv03084
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
