Cases 21 - 30 of 301
ST CLAIR BEY v. STORM et al
as 2:2023cv00454
Plaintiff:
MAYSON ST CLAIR BEY
Defendant:
STORM, VANIHEL, GILMORE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gilmore-Jackson v. Revlon Inc et al
as 1:2023cv11475
Plaintiff:
JoAn Gilmore-Jackson
Defendant:
Revlon Inc, Revlon Consumer Products Corporation, Revlon Group Holdings LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
FELLOWS v. VANIHEL et al
as 2:2023cv00432
Plaintiff:
AARON FELLOWS
Defendant:
FRANK VANIHEL, KEVIN GILMORE, CHRISTOPHER HOLCOMB and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-2692
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
GARRETT v. GILMORE
as 3:2023cv00126
Plaintiff:
ABBIE GRACE GARRETT, ABBIE GARRETT and KENTUCKY FARM BUREAU MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
DARRELL G GILMORE and DARRELL GILMORE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
MARTIN v. CUPP et al
as 2:2023cv00407
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY MARTIN
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER CUPP, BLAYZE RODGERS, SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SWEATT v. CARTER et al
as 2:2023cv00378
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL SWEATT
Defendant:
ROBERT ERIC CARTER, JR., DEREK CHRISTAIN, FRANK VANIHEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCNEIL v. GILMORE et al
as 2:2023cv00373
Plaintiff:
MICKEL J. MCNEIL
Defendant:
KEVIN GILMORE, HYATT, YARBER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ISON v. W.V.C.F. et al
as 2:2023cv00266
Plaintiff:
DAVID ISON
Defendant:
W.V.C.F., I.D.O.C., PURCELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Christopher Gilmore v. Thomas Dart, et al
as 23-1901
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER GILMORE
Defendant / Appellee:
THOMAS J. DART, COOK COUNTY HEALTHCARE PROVIDER, COOK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
