Cases 21 - 30 of 58
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv01825
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Luxottica Group S.p.A. et al v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A"
as 1:2017cv08952
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A", Belinda McIntyre, Susie May and others
Plaintiff:
Luxottica Group S.p.A. and Oakley, Inc.
Garnishee:
Norma Estrada
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Gant v. City of Chicago
as 1:2017cv08801
Plaintiff:
Chris Gant
Defendant:
City of Chicago
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Gant v. Dart et al
as 1:2017cv05689
Plaintiff:
James Leon Gant
Defendant:
Tom Dart, Supervisor, Shift Commander and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gant v. Berryhill
as 1:2017cv03606
Plaintiff:
Chris Gant
Defendant:
Nancy Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Robert Gant v. City of Chicago, et al
as 17-1679
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT GANT
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF CHICAGO, CARLOS CANNON, #12214, RONALD O. FORGUE, #380 and others
Gant v. Ebay Auto Sales et al
as 1:2016cv11129
Plaintiff:
Chris Gant
Defendant:
Ebay Auto Sales and William Presley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Gant v. City of Fort Wayne et al
as 1:2016cv00380
Plaintiff:
Anthony Gant
Defendant:
City of Fort Wayne , Daniel Hartman , Jason Palm and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Peoples et al v. Combe Incorporated et al
as 3:2016cv00847
Plaintiff:
Timothy Peoples , Elijah Reedy , Michael Nichols and others
Defendant:
Combe Incorporated , Combe Products, Inc. , Combe Laboratories, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hairston et al v. Combe Incorporated et al
as 3:2016cv00609
Plaintiff:
Henry Hairston , Christopher Walker , Richard Smith and others
Defendant:
Combe Incorporated , Combe Products, Inc. , Combe Laboratories, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
