Cases 21 - 30 of 35
Farris v. Godinez et al
as 3:2013cv00734
Plaintiff:
Donald Farris
Defendant:
Salvador Godinez, Ty J. Bates, Victor Dozier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rainey v. Hoelscher et al
as 3:2013cv00442
Plaintiff:
William Edward Rainey
Defendant:
Mike Hoelscher, Christopher Geisen, Jason Loyd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Larry Bryant v. City of Chicago, et al
as 13-1142
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LARRY D. BRYANT
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF CHICAGO, JODY P. WEIS, RICHARD ROE and others
Hazel et al v. Zimmer, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv09008
Plaintiff:
Diane Hazel and Frederick Hazel
Defendant:
Zimmer, Inc. , Zimmer Holdings, Inc. , Zimmer Orthopaedic Surgical Products, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Bryant v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2012cv07797
Plaintiff:
Larry Bryant
Defendant:
City Of Chicago, Jody Weiss, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kozicky v. Granite City Police Department et al
as 3:2012cv00797
Plaintiff:
Charles Kozicky
Defendant:
Granite City Police Department, Robert Jones, Craig Knight and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hall v. Adams et al
as 3:2010cv00819
Plaintiff:
Austin Hall
Defendant:
Sean Adams , John Doe , Richard Roe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rednour v. Jones et al
as 3:2010cv00134
Plaintiff:
Rachel Rednour
Defendant:
Ralph Jones, Jeremy Kempfer, Eric Steely and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gaul v. Hammond Indiana City of et al
as 2:2010cv00020
Plaintiff:
John S Gaul and John S Gaul
Defendant:
Hammond Indiana City of, John Doe and Richard Roe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Nixon v. Allen et al
as 3:2009cv00686
Plaintiff:
Demarcus Nixon
Defendant:
James Allen, Walter Martin, Gary Craig, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
