Cases 21 - 30 of 3,058
Plano v. United Auto Workers, Local 890
as 1:2024cv01768
Plaintiff:
Roger Plano
Defendant:
United Auto Workers, Local 890
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0401 Labor Management Disclosure Act
Barnes v. Rogers et al
as 1:2024cv01560
Plaintiff:
Maurice Barnes
Defendant:
Rogers, Thomas J. Dart and Don Beacham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01403
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Central Laborers' Pension Welfare and Annuity Fund v. R & K Excavation, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00302
Plaintiff:
Central Laborers' Pension Welfare and Annuity Fund
Defendant:
R&K EXCAVATION, INC., Roger Faulkner and R & K Excavation, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Udell Rogers v. Dorrie Love, et al
as 24-1147
Plaintiff:
UDELL ROGERS
Defendant:
DORRIE LOVE, CHAD SCHULDT, STANLEY SIMONSON and others
Hartgrave v. Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC et al
as 3:2024pq00199
Special Master:
Randi Ellis
Plaintiff:
Roger Hartgrave
Defendant:
Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC, Syngenta AG and Chevron U.S.A., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Johnston v. Richwoods Heights Township et al
as 1:2024cv01046
Plaintiff:
Suzanne L Johnston
Defendant:
Richwoods Heights Township, Board of Trustees, Roger Larson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Iszler v. Syngenta AG et al
as 3:2024pq00159
Special Master:
Randi Ellis
Plaintiff:
Roger Iszler
Defendant:
Syngenta AG, Syngenta Crop Protection LLC and Chevron USA Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Rogers v. Warden
as 3:2024cv00072
Petitioner:
Tiger A Rogers and Tiger Rogers
Respondent:
Warden
Not Yet Classified:
INDIANA STATE PRISON E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
