Cases 21 - 30 of 33
Spohn v. Kurek et al
as 1:2010cv00328
Plaintiff:
David B. Spohn
Defendant:
K. Kurek , C. Cordes , K. Sample and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Baxter v. Lappin et al
as 3:2009cv00896
Plaintiff:
David Baxter
Defendant:
Harley G Lappin, Lt. Samples, Lt. Hughes and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Gardner v. Wilson et al
as 1:2009cv03411
Plaintiff:
Derrick Gardner
Defendant:
Eric Wilson, Arthur Hoffman, Dr. Lamping and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Garber v. Wrigley et al
as 1:2008cv02449
Plaintiff:
Robert L Garber
Defendant:
William Wrigley, Jr., William D Perez, John F Bard and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Jann et al v. Sample et al
as 1:2007cv06595
Plaintiff:
Earl Jann, Earl Jann, Carol Isacson and others
Defendant:
Matthew D Sample, J. David Cross and Sample & Cross Capital Management, LLC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Bradley v. Wheeler et al
as 1:2007cv01294
Plaintiff:
Darren Scott Bradley
Defendant:
Suzanne Wheeler, Linda Black, Teri Garrett and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Davis v. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 3:2007cv00693
Plaintiff:
Tyrone H Davis
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons, C/O Francis, Unknown Party and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Shaheed v. Nalley et al
as 3:2007cv00679
Plaintiff:
Hakeem Shaheed
Defendant:
Michael K. Nalley, Randy Davis, Associate Warden Rau and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Sample v. Wright et al
as 1:2007cv03744
Petitioner:
Willie Sample
Respondent:
Stephen Wright and Nedra Chandler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv02103
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
