Cases 21 - 30 of 180
Spartannash Company v. Cargill Inc et al
as 1:2022cv05142
Defendant:
Cargill Meat Solutions Corporation, Cargill Inc, Cargill Protein and others
Plaintiff:
Spartannash Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Wigginton v. City Of Belvidere et al
as 3:2022cv50292
Plaintiff:
Richard Wigginton
Defendant:
City Of Belvidere, County Of Boone, State Of Illinois and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Felton et al v. Arnold et al
as 1:2022cv03858
Plaintiff:
Howard Felton and Penny Felton
Defendant:
Cassandra Denice Arnold and Swift Transportation of Arizona LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Motor Vehicle Product Liability
Giant Eagle Inc v. Cargill, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv02992
Defendant:
Cargill Meat Solutions Corporation, Cargill, Inc., Cargill Protein and others
Plaintiff:
Giant Eagle Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Associated Grocers, Inc. et al v. Cargill, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv02525
Defendant:
Cargill Meat Solutions Corporation, Cargill, Inc., Cargill Protein and others
Plaintiff:
ASSOCIATED GROCERS, INC., Action Meat Distributors, Inc., Affiliated Foods, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Swift v. Warden
as 3:2022cv00180
Petitioner:
Adrian Swift
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SWIFT v. WARDEN
as 3:2021cv00168
Petitioner:
CHARLES R. SWIFT, JR.
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Elliott v. Rickenberg et al
as 3:2021cv01429
Plaintiff:
Jevon Marcel Elliott
Defendant:
Brett Rickenberg, Gavin Hartley, Zach Swift and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
USA v. Ricky Swift
as 21-2608
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
RICKY SWIFT
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv00100
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
