Cases 21 - 30 of 7,773
Woodard v. Sproul
as 3:2024cv02143
Petitioner:
Marvelle Deshaun Woodard
Respondent:
Warden Sproul
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
JAMES v. WARDEN
as 1:2024cv01543
Petitioner:
DEVORIS JAMES
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
JAMES v. WARDEN
as 1:2024cv01544
Petitioner:
DEVORIS JAMES
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
CANNON v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS WARDEN AT UNITED STATES PENITENTIARY -- TERRE HAUTE INDIANA et al
as 2:2024cv00439
Plaintiff:
GREGORY L. CANNON
Defendant:
WOLF, CASE MANAGER -- A-L UNIT and FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS WARDEN AT UNITED STATES PENITENTIARY -- TERRE HAUTE INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Underwood v. Cahak
as 2:2024cv01145
Petitioner:
Robert Richard Underwood
Respondent:
Warden Brian Cahak
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
VANDERMOLEN v. WARDEN
as 2:2024cv00437
Petitioner:
KURTIS JAMES VANDERMOLEN
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Smith v. Noble et al
as 2:2024cv01136
Defendant:
Compliance Officer Prea, Jon Noble, Security Director Pusich and others
Plaintiff:
Derrick L Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sterk v. United States of America Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2024cv01319
Respondent:
Danielle Smith, Warden of FPC Pekin and United States of America Federal Bureau of Prisons
Petitioner:
Marilyn Sterk
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Compton v. Warden
as 3:2024cv00747
Respondent:
Warden
Petitioner:
Daniel Compton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
DURHAM v. WARDEN
as 1:2024cv01528
Respondent:
WARDEN
Petitioner:
DARRELL S. DURHAM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
