Cases 21 - 30 of 3,669
Evans v. Syngenta Crop Protection LLC et al
as 3:2024pq01977
Plaintiff:
Tom Evans
Defendant:
Syngenta Crop Protection LLC and Syngenta AG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Crampton v. Little et al
as 4:2024cv04156
Defendant:
Eric Dusenberry, Tom Wiley and Samuel Little
Plaintiff:
John Crampton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Heeger Jr v. Dart et al
as 1:2024cv07476
Defendant:
Tom Dart
Plaintiff:
John Robert Heeger Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ambers v. Tippecanoe County et al
as 4:2024cv00051
Defendant:
David S. Byers, Jared W. Davis, Tippecanoe County of and others
Plaintiff:
Michael E Ambers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc. v. The Partnerships And Unincorporated Associations Identified On Schedule A,
as 1:2024cv05182
Defendant:
A12N2M2N8IATK6, DongLiyuan, Foshan Shirui Trading Company Ltd and others
Plaintiff:
Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Lane v. Tom Dart et al
as 1:2024cv07392
Defendant:
Tom Dart and Officer Solis
Plaintiff:
Lavonte Lane
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wells v. Cook County Jail et al
as 1:2024cv07173
Defendant:
Tom Dart and Cook County Jail
Plaintiff:
Marvin D. Wells
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Orozco v. Cook County Jail et al
as 1:2024cv07154
Plaintiff:
Hilario L. Orozco
Defendant:
Cook County Jail and Tom Dart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hemphill v. Dart et al
as 1:2024cv07107
Defendant:
Tom Dart
Plaintiff:
Jerome Hemphill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Flowers v. Dart et al
as 1:2024cv07029
Plaintiff:
Cortez D Flowers
Defendant:
Toni Perwinkle and Tom Dart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
