Cases 21 - 30 of 50
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00505
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Sullivan v. Indiana State Prison et al
as 3:2018cv00424
Plaintiff:
Roy Sullivan
Defendant:
Indiana State Prison, Ron Neal and Mrs Arnett
Miscellaneous_party:
WABASH VALLEY E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sullivan v. Indiana State Prison et al
as 3:2018cv00414
Plaintiff:
Roy Sullivan
Defendant:
Indiana State Prison, Ron Neal and Arnett
Miscellaneous_party:
WABASH VALLEY E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SULLIVAN v. INDIANA STATE PRISON et al
as 2:2018cv00231
Defendant:
ARNETT, INDIANA STATE PRISON and RON NEAL
Plaintiff:
ROY SULLIVAN
Miscellaneou:
WVCF (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Greer v. Carter et al
as 3:2018cv00272
Plaintiff:
Jeffery A Greer
Defendant:
Robert E Carter, Jr, Ron Neal, Joseph M Thompson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MANN v. DANIELS et al
as 2:2018cv00176
Defendant:
"SECOND IN CHARGE" SHU, LARRY ALLEN, K. ARNETT and others
Plaintiff:
RANDEEP SINGH MANN
Names Currently Unknown:
SHU LT.
John Does #1- #10 Names Currently Unknown:
SHU OFFICERS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
BELL v. ARNETT
as 1:2017cv04408
Defendant:
KEITH ARNETT
Plaintiff:
RICHARD N. BELL
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 504 Copyright Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2017cv00008
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
ARNETT v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2016cv02685
Plaintiff:
KEN ARNETT
Unknown:
Howard A. Snyder
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Arnett v. Superintendent
as 3:2016cv00054
Petitioner:
Kurt E Arnett
Respondent:
Superintendent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
