Cases 31 - 40 of 277
KREILEIN v. STATE OF INDIANA et al
as 1:2023cv00143
Petitioner:
ALAN KREILEIN
Respondent:
STATE OF INDIANA, TRACY BERRY, LAURA KLOIMWEIDER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dagans v. Bookhart et al
as 3:2022cv03097
Plaintiff:
Jerrold Dagans
Defendant:
Deanna M Bookhart, Heather Cecil and C/O Suddath
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FRAZIER v. CARTER et al
as 1:2022cv02466
Plaintiff:
JASPER FRAZIER
Defendant:
ROBERT E. CARTER, CHRISTINA REAGLE, BOB BUGHER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. Illinois et al
as 3:2022cv02837
Plaintiff:
Raphael Taylor
Defendant:
State of Illinois, District II Chicago Police Station, District II Chicago Circuit Court and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson et al v. Grant County Jail
as 1:2022cv00420
Plaintiff:
Cecil Johnson, Charles B. Neff and Chad Exey Hammond
Defendant:
Grant County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shah El v. Frazier et al
as 3:2022cv50387
Plaintiff:
Cecil Shah El
Defendant:
Makala Frazier, Brad Cars, Lance Reinbolz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KREILEIN v. CECIL et al
as 1:2022cv02072
Plaintiff:
ALAN KREILEIN
Defendant:
CECIL and SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dontaneous Salley v. Jeffrey Clark, et al
as 22-2700
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DONTANEOUS SALLEY
Defendant / Appellee:
JEFFREY CLARK, RICHARD FARLEY, SHANE LEIBY and others
MOORE v. GEO GROUP, INC et al
as 1:2022cv01728
Plaintiff:
KEVIN D. MOORE
Defendant:
GEO GROUP, INC, MARK SEVIER, G. CECIL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jeffrey Rowe v. Ashley Taylor, et al
as 22-2361
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JEFFREY A. ROWE
Defendant / Appellee:
ASHLEY TAYLOR, ANDREW SICKMANN, MYRA STROBEL and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
