Cases 31 - 40 of 631
Kevin Chandler v. Ron Neal
as 23-2400
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KEVIN CHANDLER
Defendant / Appellee:
RON NEAL
Simmons v. Chandler et al
as 1:2023cv04573
Plaintiff:
Marcel Simmons
Defendant:
Scott R. Chandler, Lima One Capital, LLC, Steven C. Lindberg and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Chandler v. Walmart, Inc
as 3:2023cv01302
Plaintiff:
Anthony Chandler
Defendant:
Walmart, Inc and Walmart, Inc doing business as Sam's Club
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Art Ask Agency v. The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto
as 1:2023cv02212
Plaintiff:
Art Ask Agency
Defendant:
The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto, BKQU Oversize Store, Dinboa-6 Store and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44 Trademark Infringement
Kevin Chandler v. John Galipeau
as 23-1287
Petitioner / Appellant:
KEVIN CHANDLER
Respondent / Appellee:
JOHN GALIPEAU
Mock v. Griner et al
as 1:2023cv00050
Plaintiff:
Michael Jeffrey Mock
Defendant:
Benjamin Griner, Bradley Carlson, Chandler McCutcheon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv02442
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Chandler v. Warden
as 3:2022cv01037
Petitioner:
Kevin Chandler
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Svedine v. State of Illinois
as 3:2022cv02563
Petitioner:
Jonathan Chandler Svedine
Respondent:
People of the State of Illinois
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Chandler v. Bergami
as 3:2022cv50370
Petitioner:
Arthur Lee Chandler
Respondent:
Thomas Bergami
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
