Cases 31 - 40 of 91
Bode v. AERCO International, Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv01310
Plaintiff:
Jason Bode
Defendant:
AERCO International, Inc., Air Products and Chemicals, Inc., Ameron International Corporation and others
Cross_claimant:
Georgia-Pacific LLC , Ingersoll-Rand Company , Industrial Holding Corporation and others
Cross_defendant:
Georgia-Pacific LLC , Ingersoll-Rand Company , Industrial Holding Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Byers et al v. Ameren Corporation et al
as 3:2013cv01299
Plaintiff:
Larry Byers and Delberta Byers
Defendant:
Ameren Corporation, Armstrong International, Inc., Asbestos Corporation LTD. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
HEDDEN et al v. A.W. CHESTERTON CO. et al
as 1:2013cv01986
Defendant:
A.W. CHESTERTON CO., AURORA PUMP COMPANY, CBS CORPORATION and others
Plaintiff:
BRYAN KIMBERLY HEDDEN and CYNTHIA HEDDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Asbestos Litigation
Gordon v. Viking Pump Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv08788
Defendant:
Viking Pump Inc., Dana Co LLC, ITT Industries Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Vivian Gordon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Mohler v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation et al
as 3:2013cv01221
Defendant:
Sunoco, Inc. (R&M), Welco Manufacturing Company, Murco Wall Products, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Elaine Mohler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Shewmake v. AERCO International, Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv01223
Cross Defendant:
Rockwell Automation, Inc., Crane Company, Beazer East, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Welco Manufacturing Company, Brand Insulations, Inc., Young Insulation Group of St. Louis, Inc. and others
Cross Claimant:
General Cable Industries, Inc., AERCO International, Inc., Vanderbilt Minerals, LLC and others
Counter Defendant:
Helen Pearl Shewmake
Counter Claimant:
Grimes Aerospace Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Fulwider v. AERCO International, Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv01220
Counter Defendant:
Ameron International Corporation, The Dow Chemical Company, Research-Cottrell, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Welco Manufacturing Company, Brand Insulations, Inc., Young Insulation Group of St. Louis, Inc. and others
Cross Claimant:
General Cable Industries, Inc., AERCO International, Inc., Vanderbilt Minerals, LLC and others
Cross Defendant:
Dap, Inc., Ralph Lewis Fulwider, Crane Company and others
Counter Claimant:
Grimes Aerospace Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Graham et al v. A.W. Chesterton Company et al
as 3:2013cv01219
Plaintiff:
Donald Graham and Rosemary Graham
Defendant:
A.W. Chesterton Company, Borgwarner Morse Tec Inc. , Brand Insulations Inc. and others
Cross_claimant:
Trane U.S. Inc. , Ingersoll-Rand Company , Industrial Holdings Corporation and others
Cross_defendant:
Trane U.S. Inc. , A.W. Chesterton Company, Borgwarner Morse Tec Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Kirschner et al v. AERCO International, Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv01207
Plaintiff:
Edward Kirschner and Eugenia Kirschner
Defendant:
AERCO International, Inc., American National Insurance Company, American Optical Corporation and others
Cross_claimant:
Illinois Tool Works, Inc. , Georgia-Pacific LLC , Ingersoll-Rand Company and others
Cross_defendant:
Illinois Tool Works, Inc. , 3M Company, AERCO International, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Fanelli v. Asbestos Corporation LTD. et al
as 3:2013cv01035
Plaintiff:
William Fanelli
Defendant:
Asbestos Corporation LTD., Atwood & Morrill Company, Inc., Borgwarner Morse Tec, Inc. and others
Cross_claimant:
Borgwarner Morse Tec, Inc. , Trane US, Inc. and Ingersoll-Rand Company
Cross_defendant:
Borgwarner Morse Tec, Inc. , Asbestos Corporation LTD., Atwood & Morrill Company, Inc. and others
Counter_claimant:
Imo Industries, Inc. , Certainteed Corporation and RSCC Wire & Cable LLC
Counter_defendant:
Imo Industries, Inc. , Asbestos Corporation LTD., Atwood & Morrill Company, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
