Cases 31 - 39 of 39
Houser v. Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 3:2010cv11161
Plaintiff:
Beth Houser
Defendant:
Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Bayer Schering Pharma AG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lang v. Houser et al
as 1:2010cv00140
Plaintiff:
Jessica Lang
Defendant:
Brent Houser, Mike Sprunger and Aaron Knisely
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv00118
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
SMITH v. JETT et al
as 2:2010cv00110
Defendant:
C.O. HOUSER, WARDEN JETT, CAPTAIN JOYNER and others
Plaintiff:
JOE ANTHONY SMITH, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TUF-TITE, Inc. v. Polylok, Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv05794
Plaintiff:
TUF-TITE, Inc. and TUF-TITE, Inc.
Defendant:
Polylok, Inc. and Bruce Houser
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
McPartlan et al v. Citgo Petroleum Corporation
as 1:2009cv00299
Plaintiff:
Hugh McPartlan, Dawn McPartlan, Aaron E Houser and others
Defendant:
Citgo Petroleum Corporation, Citgo Petroleum Corporation, Citgo Petroleum Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Brown v. Lembcke et al
as 3:2008cv00670
Plaintiff:
Larry F. Brown
Defendant:
Linda Lembcke, Chris Lindloff, Vanessa Korias and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Cabrera et al v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2007cv06924
Plaintiff:
Ralph Cabrera and Reina M. Cabrera
Defendant:
City of Chicago, Mara S Georges, Myriam Zreczny Kasper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WALKER v. FLOYD COUNTY INDIANA et al
as 4:2007cv00014
Plaintiff:
PAMELA WALKER, PAMELA WALKER, PAMELA WALKER and others
Defendant:
FLOYD COUNTY INDIANA, FLOYD COUNTY INDIANA, DARRELL MILLS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
