Cases 31 - 40 of 53
Karen Stewart v. Caterpillar Incorporated Non-C
as 15-1858
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KAREN J. STEWART
Defendant - Appellee:
CATERPILLAR INCORPORATED NON-CONTRIBUTORY PENSION PLAN
STEWART v. CARAWAY
as 2:2015cv00038
Respondent:
J. F. CARAWAY
Petitioner:
JESSE J. STEWART
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Stewart v. United States of America
as 2:2015cv00073
Petitioner:
Jermaine J Stewart
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Stewart v. Caterpillar, Inc. Non-Contributory Pension Plan
as 1:2014cv08667
Defendant:
Caterpillar, Inc. Non-Contributory Pension Plan
Plaintiff:
Karen J. Stewart
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Jesse Stewart v. Branden Noonan, et al
as 13-3784
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JESSE J. STEWART
Defendant - Appellee:
BRANDEN J. NOONAN, Officer and KEVIN SMALL, Sergeant
STEWART v. NOONAN et al
as 2:2013cv00148
Defendant:
BRANDEN J. NOONAN and KEVIN SMALL
Plaintiff:
JESSE J. STEWART
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Tolbert et al v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Company et al
as 1:2013cv00647
Plaintiff:
Samuel D Tolbert , Donna R Haughton , James C Haughton and others
Defendant:
Bristol-Myers Squibb Company , Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC , Sanofi-Aventis, U.S., Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
STEWART v. ASTRUE
as 2:2013cv00029
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Plaintiff:
JESSE J. STEWART
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Karen Stewart v. Caterpillar, Incorporated
as 13-1007
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KAREN J. STEWART
Defendant - Appellee:
CATERPILLAR, INCORPORATED, a U.S. Corporation Incorporated in the state of Delaware
Jesse Stewart v. John Caraway
as 12-3628
Petitioner - Appellant:
JESSE J. STEWART
Respondent - Appellee:
JOHN F. CARAWAY, Warden
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
