Cases 31 - 40 of 57
Knothe, Ross v. Helgeson, Steve et al
as 3:2017cv00122
Plaintiff:
Ross F. Knothe
Defendant:
Steve Helgeson , Steve Anderson , John Does 1 - 3 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Graham v. Knaver et al
as 1:2017cv01005
Plaintiff:
Anton Graham
Defendant:
Debbie Knaver, Guy D Pierce, S Simpson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Holm, Victor v. Casiana et al
as 3:2016cv00794
Plaintiff:
Victor E. Holm
Defendant:
Casiana , Anderson, Trisha Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Marquez v. Dart et al
as 1:2016cv10771
Plaintiff:
Angel Marquez
Defendant:
Tom Dart and John Doe 1-3
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mike Russell v. County of Cook, et al
as 15-3111
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MIKE RUSSELL
Defendant - Appellee:
COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS, JOHN DOES, 1-3 a Commander, a Lieutenant and a Sergeant of Division 9, Cook County Department of Corrections and THOMAS J. DART, Sheriff of Cook County, Illinois
Raney et al v. Morgan County et al
as 3:2015cv03253
Plaintiff:
Douglas Raney , Michael Shackelford and Tim Hagen
Defendant:
Morgan County, Randy Duvendack, Derek Suttles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
John M. Stimac v. P.O. Hosteny et al
as 1:2015cv07399
Plaintiff:
John M. Stimac
Movant:
Gregory E. Kulis & Associates, Ltd.
Defendant:
P.O. Hosteny, P.O. John Doe 1-3 and Village of Hodgkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Grant v. Doe et al
as 1:2015cv01165
Plaintiff:
Nathan Grant
Defendant:
John Does 1-3 and Greg Gossett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Corder v. Does 1-3 et al
as 1:2014cv10363
Plaintiff:
Eric Bryant Corder
Defendant:
John Does 1-3 and Tom Dart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Koschman v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2014cv02041
Plaintiff:
Nanci Koschman
Defendant:
The City of Chicago , Ronald Yawger, Rita O'Leary and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
