Cases 31 - 40 of 154
Griffith v. Burkehead et al
as 3:2022cv03205
Plaintiff:
James Griffith
Defendant:
Diane Burkehead, Brian McReynolds, Josh Durrant and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hunt v. Kocher et al
as 2:2022cv02198
Plaintiff:
Tavaris Earl Hunt
Defendant:
Amber Kocher, . Studniarz, P Solis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sutton v. Reynolds et al
as 3:2022cv03183
Plaintiff:
Timothy Sutton
Defendant:
Brian Reynolds, Josh Durant, Austin Chamberlin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Higgins et al v. Village of Lyons et al
as 1:2022cv04563
Plaintiff:
Edward Higgins and Alexander Garesche
Defendant:
Village of Lyons, Thomas Herion, Officer J. Barajas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
DeHaven v. Benzinger et al
as 4:2022cv04120
Plaintiff:
Shawn DeHaven
Defendant:
Scott Benzinger, Wes Woolson, Josh Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv04113
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv04106
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Harris v. Feeney et al
as 1:2022cv01256
Petitioner:
Joseph L Harris
Respondent:
Charles Feeney, Matthew Smith, Dennis Wertz and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Jones v. Knight et al
as 1:2022cv01253
Plaintiff:
Tyson Keith Jones
Defendant:
Gary W Knight, Tony Mueller, Jamie White and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Stover v. Champaign County Jail
as 2:2022cv02123
Plaintiff:
Josh Andrew Stover
Defendant:
Champaign County Jail, . Borden, . McMann and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
