Cases 31 - 40 of 67
Martin v. Tax Appeal Business Systems, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv09806
Plaintiff:
Nicholas M Martin
Defendant:
Tax Appeal Business Systems, Inc. and George Vallejo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
MARTIN v. HOWMEDICA OSTEONICS CORP. et al
as 1:2015cv01143
Defendant:
HOWMEDICA OSTEONICS CORP. and STRYKER CORPORATION
Plaintiff:
LOIS M. MARTIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle
Williams v. Merle Pharmacy Inc et al
as 1:2015cv01262
Plaintiff:
Rhonda S Williams
Defendant:
Merle Pharmacy Inc, Central Illinois Medical Equipment Inc. and William M Martin
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Caldwell v. Martin
as 2:2015cv00133
Plaintiff:
Chase Caldwell
Defendant:
Karen M Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martin v. USA
as 3:2015cv00311
Petitioner:
Raymond M. Martin
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Martin v. L & J Bay Area Holdings, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv03096
Defendant:
L & J Bay Area Holdings, Inc. and Edward Dement
Plaintiff:
Nicholas M Martin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
BASKIN et al v. BOGAN et al
as 1:2014cv00355
Plaintiff:
MARILYN RAE BASKIN, DAWN LYNN CARVER, PAMELA RUTH ELEASE EANES and others
Defendant:
PEGGY BEAVER, PENNY BOGAN, MICHAEL A. BROWN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WEAVER v. MARTIN et al
as 2:2013cv00194
Respondent:
M MARTIN, WARDEN and L WESTON
Petitioner:
MARK SHANNON WEAVER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Deutsche Bank National Trust Company v. Martin et al
as 1:2013cv02219
Plaintiff:
Deutsche Bank National Trust Company
Defendant:
Ricky Martin, LVNV Funding, LLC and Essie M. Martin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Mortgage Foreclosure
Martin v. Public Policy Polling, LLC
as 1:2013cv01407
Defendant:
Public Policy Polling, LLC
Plaintiff:
Nicholas M Martin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
