Cases 31 - 40 of 598
Johll, Christopher v. Village of McFarland et al
as 3:2023cv00618
Plaintiff:
Christopher Johll
Defendant:
Village of McFarland, John Miller, Jessica Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sherven, Matthew v. National Security Agency
as 3:2023cv00603
Plaintiff:
Matthew J. Sherven
Defendant:
National Security Agency
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Lush, Stephen v. Bechler, Lawrence et al
as 3:2023cv00537
Plaintiff:
Stephen Lush
Defendant:
Lawrence Edgar Bechler, Middleton Police Department, Michelle C. Schwartz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00520
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Alvarado v. Burns et al
as 2:2023cv01020
Plaintiff:
Ramon Alvarado, Jr
Defendant:
Matthew Burns and Ryan Kuepper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Matthews v. McDermott
as 1:2023cv00971
Petitioner:
Donna Rae Matthews
Respondent:
Jennifer McDermott
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sherven, Matthew v. Central Intelligence Agency
as 3:2023cv00466
Plaintiff:
Matthew J. Sherven
Defendant:
Central Intelligence Agency
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Eichelberger v. Yardley et al
as 2:2023cv00888
Plaintiff:
Kalvin Ray Eichelberger
Defendant:
Judge Laurie J Yardley, Bruce J Prenda, Morgan C Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00873
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McClain v. Chisolm et al
as 1:2023cv00860
Plaintiff:
Spencer R McClain
Defendant:
John Chisolm, Eric Bashirian, Steven Strasser and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
