Cases 31 - 40 of 51
HOUSTON v. MCCORKLE
as 1:2017cv03310
Plaintiff:
WAYNE HOUSTON
Defendant:
RICHARD A. MCCORKLE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
GOSSER v. HENRY COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2017cv03257
Plaintiff:
DOUGLAS J. GOSSER
Defendant:
BRENT GRIDER, HENRY COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, ROBERT HUXHOLD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
LOVELESS v. MCCORKLE et al
as 1:2017cv02206
Defendant:
REX A. HARROLD and RICHARD A. MCCORKLE
Plaintiff:
MURRELL D. LOVELESS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McCorkle v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2017cv00476
Plaintiff:
Lorenzo McCorkle
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Johnson v. Guidotti et al
as 1:2016cv11614
Plaintiff:
Eric A Johnson
Defendant:
Nicholas C Guidotti, Jeremy E Roach, Joshua I Vittori and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HEINRICH et al v. MCCORKLE et al
as 1:2016cv03026
Defendant:
BRUCE BAKER, RICHARD BOUSLOG, KIM CRONK and others
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER BAKER, HANNAH HEINRICH, JAMES KENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ADAMS v. MCCORKLE et al
as 1:2014cv01849
Plaintiff:
DILLON ADAMS
Defendant:
JAY DAVIS, JOHN DOE #1, JOHN DOE #3 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sobin v. Lowry et al
as 3:2014cv01500
Plaintiff:
Gregory D Sobin
Defendant:
Evan Lowry, Indiana Dept of Correction, Bruce Lemmon and others
Miscellaneous_party:
WESTVILLE E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Weck v. Fricano Enterprises, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv05630
Plaintiff:
Madonna Weck
Defendant:
Fricano Enterprises, Inc. and Scott McCorkle
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
January V. McCorkle et al.
as 1:2011cv03195
Plaintiff:
Charles January
Defendant:
William McCorkle and Michael Martin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
