Cases 31 - 40 of 5,083
SIMEON v. MAYORKAS et al
as 1:2024cv00448
Plaintiff:
ROSENA SIMEON
Defendant:
ALEJANDRO N. MAYORKAS, UR M. JADDOU, CONNIE NOLAN and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
ORR v. ARAMARK CORRECTIONAL SERVICES et al
as 2:2024cv00161
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ORR
Defendant:
ARAMARK CORRECTIONAL SERVICES, BUTLER, FRANK VANIHEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00210
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
MARCHANT v. CENTURION HEALTH SERVICES et al
as 2:2024cv00075
Plaintiff:
AUTUMN MARCHANT
Defendant:
CENTURION HEALTH SERVICES, AMELIA BRUNER, CHRISTINA NUDI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00345
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00723
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00726
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00722
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00368
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
MARSHALL v. ARAMARK CORRECTIONAL SERVICES, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00728
Plaintiff:
SHAWN MARSHALL A.K.A. DEEZ NUTZ
Defendant:
ARAMARK CORRECTIONAL SERVICES, LLC, KELCY PENNINGTON and COUCH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
