Cases 31 - 40 of 1,519
Donald Nicodemus v. City of South Bend, et al
as 24-1099
Plaintiff:
DONALD NICODEMUS
Defendant:
CITY OF SOUTH BEND, INDIANA and STATE OF INDIANA
Amicus Curiae:
NATIONAL PRESS PHOTOGRAPHERS ASSOCIATION and 5 NEWS MEDIA ORGANIZATIONS
Maverick Young v. State of Indiana
as 24-1017
Plaintiff:
MAVERICK A. YOUNG
Defendant:
STATE OF INDIANA
WEBB v. STATE OF INDIANA
as 1:2024cv00028
Petitioner:
MERLE R. WEBB
Respondent:
STATE OF INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Megan Rosenbaum v. State of Indiana
as 24-1003
Plaintiff:
MEGAN A. ROSENBAUM
Defendant:
STATE OF INDIANA
TUDELA et al v. STATE OF INDIANA et al
as 3:2023cv00233
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Michael Tudela and Abbey Tudela
Defendant:
STATE OF INDIANA, VANDERBURGH COUNTY PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE, Vanderburgh County Former Prosecutor Nicholas Hermann and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Maverick Young v. State of Indiana
as 23-3408
Plaintiff:
MAVERICK A. YOUNG
Defendant:
STATE OF INDIANA
PIRANT v. STATE OF INDIANA
as 1:2023cv02290
Petitioner:
JAMIL M. PIRANT
Respondent:
STATE OF INDIANA
Defendant:
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
CHAMBERS v. HAMILTON COUNTY AND JOHNSON FOR THE STATE OF INDIANA et al
as 1:2023cv02216
Plaintiff:
KENNETH CHAMBERS
Defendant:
HAMILTON COUNTY AND JOHNSON FOR THE STATE OF INDIANA, DENNIS QUAKENBUSH, JOSH CAREY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
STONE-DUNLAP v. STATE OF INDIANA
as 1:2023cv02199
Petitioner:
ERIC STONE-DUNLAP
Respondent:
STATE OF INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
ELMORE v. STATE OF INDIANA
as 1:2023cv02182
Plaintiff:
KENNY L. ELMORE
Defendant:
STATE OF INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
