Cases 31 - 38 of 38
RICHMAN, ROBERT D. v. U.S. DEPT. OF JUSTICE
as 3:1990cv00019
Plaintiff:
Robert D. Richman and Susan I. Richman
Defendant:
U.s. Dept. Of Justice
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Smith v. Illinois Dept. of Justice et al
as 1:2009cv01203
Petitioner:
Matthew J. Smith
Respondent:
Illinois Dept. of Justice and Attorney General of the State of Illinois
Defendant:
Service List
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Roy v. Obama et al
as 4:2009cv04031
Plaintiff:
Kamel K Roy
Defendant:
Barack Obama, John McCain, United States Government and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. Illinois Dept. of Justice et al
as 1:2009cv02634
Petitioner:
Matthew J. Smith
Respondent:
Illinois Dept. of Justice
Defendant:
Attorney General of the State of Illinois
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Eugene Brown, Jr. v. Patrick Fitzgerald, et al
as 08-2778
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EUGENE W. BROWN, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
PATRICK J. FITZGERALD, individually and in his capacity as U.S. Attorney, Northern District of Illinois, THOMAS P. WALSH, individually and in his capacity as Assistant U.S. Attorney, Chief of Civil Division, H. JARRETT MARSHALL, individually and in his capacity as Counsel for the U.S. Dept. of Justice Office of Professional Responsibility and others
TROUTT v. MARYBERRY et al
as 2:2008cv00127
Plaintiff:
ERIC TROUTT
Defendant:
H.J. MARYBERRY, U.S. DEPT OF JUSTICE, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
MCINTOSH v. LAPPIN et al
as 2:2008cv00071
Plaintiff:
CARL MCINTOSH
Defendant:
HARLEY G. LAPPIN, ALBERTO R. GONZALES, MICHAEL MUSKASEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bell v. USA et al
as 2:2008cv02042
Petitioner:
James Dalton Bell
Respondent:
USA, Dept of Justice, Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
