Cases 41 - 50 of 58
Davidson et al v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Company et al
as 3:2012cv00058
Plaintiff:
Richard Davidson , David Butler , Patrick Hahne and others
Defendant:
Bristol-Myers Squibb Company , Sanofi-Aventis U.S., L.L.C. , Sanofi-Aventis, U.S., Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Aranda et al v. Walgreen Co. et al
as 3:2011cv00654
Plaintiff:
Gaby Aranda , Jose Aranda , Becky Arceneaux and others
Defendant:
Walgreen Co. , Hoffman-La Roche Inc. , Roche Laboratories, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Jerry Thacker v. Level 3 Communications, Incor
as 11-2341
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JERRY THACKER
Defendant - Appellee:
LEVEL 3 COMMUNICATIONS, INCORPORATED, and all those in active concert
THACKER v. LEVEL 3 COMMUNICATIONS INC.
as 1:2011cv00616
Defendant:
LEVEL 3 COMMUNICATIONS INC.
Plaintiff:
JERRY THACKER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
THACKER v. FINNAN
as 1:2010cv01109
Respondent:
ALAN FINNAN
Petitioner:
MARK A. THACKER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Alvarez v. Snyder et al
as 3:2010cv03212
Plaintiff:
Manuel Alvarez
Defendant:
Donald N Snyder, Roger Walker, Michael P. Randle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WESTFIELD INSURANCE COMPANY v. SENTRY HOMES, INC. et al
as 1:2010cv00331
Defendant:
SENTRY HOMES, INC., MICHAEL T. THACKER and TAMARA D. THACKER
Plaintiff:
WESTFIELD INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Gao v. Snyder et al
as 1:2010cv01025
Plaintiff:
Jinrun Gao
Defendant:
Stephen Snyder, Karen Castrischer and Lindsay Thacker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
Ross Thacker v. USA
as 09-3902
Petitioner - Appellant:
ROSS THACKER
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Jerry Thacker v. County Clerks Office of Vander
as 09-3898
Petitioner:
JERRY THACKER
Respondent:
COUNTY CLERKS OFFICE OF VANDERBURGH COUNTY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
