Cases 41 - 50 of 82
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv00008
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act
Ellis v. Shurtz et al
as 3:2015cv01155
Plaintiff:
Rondale L Ellis
Defendant:
Tyson P Shurtz, Sergeant Pelker, Steven P Richard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv07391
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Catherine v. Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv07174
Plaintiff:
Cartwright Catherine
Defendant:
Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Bayer Corporation, Johnson & Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv06934
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv06759
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Cartwright v. AbbVie, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv06435
Plaintiff:
Henry Cartwright
Defendant:
AbbVie, Inc., Abbott Laboratories, AbbVie Products, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Clark v. Cartwright et al
as 3:2015cv00719
Plaintiff:
Daniel Clark
Defendant:
K Cartwright, R Pelker and G Korondo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dunmore v. Duncan et al
as 3:2015cv00706
Plaintiff:
James E Dunmore
Defendant:
Stephen B Duncan, Donald Stolworthy, Joseph Yurkovich and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ARMSTRONG et al v. CELLULAR SALES OF INDIANA LLC et al
as 2:2015cv00133
Plaintiff:
ERIK ARMSTRONG, JAMES CARTWRIGHT and NICHOLE KRUSE
Defendant:
CELLULAR SALES OF INDIANA LLC and CELLULAR SALES OF KNOXVILLE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
