Cases 41 - 50 of 2,381
United States of America v. Lewis
as 1:2024cv04801
Defendant:
Steffan Lewis
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Remedies on motion attacking sentence
Lewis v. City of Bloomington et al
as 1:2024cv01202
Plaintiff:
Kintone Lewis
Defendant:
Hector Melchor, Matthew Summers and City of Bloomington
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lewis, Daniel v. Stafford, Bridgette et al
as 3:2024cv00366
Plaintiff:
Daniel F. W. Lewis
Defendant:
Bridgette L. Stafford, John Doe, John Doe / 1 through 5 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lewis v. Beauty Bell Enterprises LLC f/k/a House of Cheatham, Inc et al
as 1:2024cv04502
Defendant:
Strength of Nature, LLC, L'Oral USA, Inc., Revlon, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Sabrina Lewis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Yameen v. CPD et al
as 1:2024cv04487
Defendant:
Director Heidi E. Mueller, CCDOC, Daniela Silaides and others
Plaintiff:
Muhammad Yameen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lewis v. Pence et al
as 1:2024cv00218
Defendant:
Alyssa Anne Frazier, Paul Sinnes, Maegan Noelle Perry and others
Plaintiff:
Dylan James Lewis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lewis v. USA
as 1:2024cv00215
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Dewayne Lewis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
GRUTZIUS v. LEWIS BROTHERS BAKERIES, INC.
as 3:2024cv00089
Plaintiff:
Joshua Grutzius
Defendant:
Lewis Brothers Bakeries, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Default
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv04111
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
WOOLSEY v. LEWIS BROTHERS BAKERIES, INC.
as 3:2024cv00084
Plaintiff:
Kian Woolsey
Defendant:
LEWIS BROTHERS BAKERIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Default
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
