Cases 41 - 50 of 8,701
Eubanks v. Smith et al
as 3:2024cv00752
Defendant:
D.H.B, D.H.B Board, Smith and others
Plaintiff:
James Edward Smith Eubanks, Jr. and James E S Eubanks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. AFAM Concept, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv07694
Defendant:
House of Cheatham LLC, Loreal USA Products, Inc., Beauty Bell Enterprises LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Sharon Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv07658
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Smith v. David
as 3:2024cv02039
Plaintiff:
Aaron Lee Smith
Defendant:
Alfonso David
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Montezon v. United States of America et al
as 1:2024cv01301
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, United States of America and Danielle Smith
Petitioner:
Tina Montezon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Smith, Jr. v. USA
as 1:2024cv00358
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Derrick A Smith, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Smith v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv00713
Plaintiff:
Jocelyn J. Smith
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Smith v. Wagner
as 2:2024cv01083
Respondent:
Jeffrey A Wagner
Petitioner:
Tyrone Davis Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Loreal USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv07616
Defendant:
Roux Laboratories, Namaste Laboratories LLC, Loreal USA Products, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Tracy Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Smith v. Lammer
as 1:2024cv07630
Respondent:
Warden Brian Lammer
Petitioner:
James T Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
