Cases 41 - 50 of 987
Cabrera et al v. Ledger SAS et al
as 1:2024cv00182
Plaintiff:
Edwin Cabrera, Kevin Camorlinga, Austin Richard and others
Defendant:
Ledger SAS and Ledger Technologies, Inc.
AUSTIN v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2024cv00024
Plaintiff:
EZRA SHERMAN HENRY AUSTIN
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00004
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
WOODY et al v. REAGLE et al
as 1:2023cv02315
Plaintiff:
BRANDON WOODY, ANTHONY WHITE, MARCO WEBSTER and others
Defendant:
DENNIS REAGLE, MAGGIE BRYANT, CENTURION HEALTH OF INDIANA, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ECKES v. PRETORIUS
as 2:2023cv00583
Petitioner:
AUSTIN ECKES
Respondent:
PRETORIUS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Swafford v. Hughes et al
as 3:2023cv03350
Plaintiff:
Gary Swafford
Defendant:
Latoya Hughes, Glen Austin, Vernon Dewitt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. Rohlfing et al
as 3:2023cv03939
Plaintiff:
Ivan Jones
Defendant:
Neal Rohlfing, Kyle Koester, Austin Crimm and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ABDELSALEM et al v. BLINKEN et al
as 1:2023cv02233
Plaintiff:
RAMADAN MUHAMMED ABDELSALEM, BORAK AHMED ALAGHA and HASHEM AHMED ALAGHA
Defendant:
ANTONY J. BLINKEN and LLOYD J. AUSTIN, III
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02213
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Austin v. L'Oreal USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv16540
Plaintiff:
Marcia Austin
Defendant:
L'Oral USA, Inc., L'Oral USA Products, Inc., SoftSheen-Carson, LLC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157 Motion for Withdrawal of Reference
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
