Cases 41 - 50 of 1,675
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02248
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Lee v. Castanedo et al
as 3:2024cv50112
Plaintiff:
Brandon Lee
Defendant:
Michael Castanedo, Samantha Rodriguez and John Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Schlemm, David v. Carr, Kevin et al
as 3:2024cv00169
Plaintiff:
David A. Schlemm
Defendant:
Kevin A. Carr, Edward Wall, Larry Fuchs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dennison et al v. Lady May Chicago LLC et al
as 1:2024cv02161
Plaintiff:
Jessica Dennison, Humberto Jesus Pacheco, Veronica Rojas and others
Defendant:
Lady May Chicago LLC and Robert "Memphis&q Garrett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
JONES v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2024cv00474
Plaintiff:
BRANDON K. JONES
Defendant:
MARTIN J O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Johnson v. Warden
as 3:2024cv00199
Petitioner:
Brandon Lee Johnson and Brandon Johnson
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. Warden
as 3:2024cv00198
Petitioner:
Brandon Lee Johnson and Brandon Johnson
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Scruggs v. Bridegroom et al
as 3:2024cv00200
Plaintiff:
Christopher L Scruggs
Defendant:
Nicole Bridegroom, Titianna Moody, Jason English and others
Not Yet Classified:
WESTVILLE E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BRANDON v. HUMPHREY et al
as 1:2024cv00406
Plaintiff:
JEREMY BRANDON
Defendant:
HUMPHREY, GUINN and BOSTOCK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Teague et al v. Kia America, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00374
Plaintiff:
Brandon Teague and Tara Teague
Defendant:
Kia America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
