Cases 41 - 50 of 1,565
Brown v. Morales et al
as 1:2024cv00308
Plaintiff:
David Brown, Jr.
Defendant:
Jeremy Morales, David Cavazos, Ron Blas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Carina Ventures LLC v. Agri Stats, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv16948
Defendant:
Cargill Protein North America, Agri Stats Inc., Express Markets Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Carina Ventures LLC, Burford Capital Ltd., Boies, Schiller & Flexner LLP and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Swafford v. Hughes et al
as 3:2023cv03350
Plaintiff:
Gary Swafford
Defendant:
Latoya Hughes, Glen Austin, Vernon Dewitt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sims v. IDOC et al
as 4:2023cv04221
Plaintiff:
Danny Sims
Defendant:
Illinois Department of Corrections, . Baker, Ryan A Oelberg and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sims v. IDOC et al
as 3:2023cv03895
Plaintiff:
Danny Sims
Defendant:
IDOC, Warden Baker, Ryan` A Oelberg and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ayoubi v. Hughes et al
as 4:2023cv04220
Plaintiff:
Firas Ayoubi
Defendant:
Latoya Hughes, T Baker, Unknown Contractor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Abuharba v. McCarthy et al
as 3:2023cv03834
Plaintiff:
Mohammed Abuharba
Defendant:
Nathan McCarthy, Joshua Schoenbeck, Anthony Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dominguez v. Hughes et al
as 1:2023cv16285
Plaintiff:
Luis Dominguez
Defendant:
Latoya Hughes, Wexford Health Sources, Dr. David Poor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reco Wilson v. Tyrone Baker
as 23-3257
Petitioner / Appellant:
RECO WILSON
Respondent / Appellee:
TYRONE BAKER, Warden
Juan Garcia v. Tyrone Baker
as 23-3204
Petitioner / Appellant:
JUAN GARCIA
Respondent / Appellee:
TYRONE BAKER, Warden
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
