Cases 41 - 50 of 1,116
BARLEY v. ELI LILLY, INC
as 1:2023cv01161
Plaintiff:
BILL L. BARLEY
Defendant:
ELI LILLY, INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Bledsoe v. Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC et al
as 3:2023pq02232
Special Master:
Randi Ellis
Plaintiff:
Bill Bledsoe
Defendant:
Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC, Syngenta AG and Chevron USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Leo Digital (Hong Kong) Company Limited v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations identified in Schedule A
as 1:2023cv03745
Plaintiff:
Leo Digital (Hong Kong) Company Limited
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations identified in Schedule A, AiJuZhou-mz, ANNOOMM and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
WARREN v. GOODNIGHT et al
as 1:2023cv00968
Plaintiff:
JOCELYN WARREN
Defendant:
GREG GOODNIGHT, TYLER MOORE, CITY OF KOKOMO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03444
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Antwan Carruthers v. Elkhart County Sheriff, et al
as 23-2005
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANTWAN M. CARRUTHERS, also known as MRS. EYE KEYLA MY. CARRUTHERS WASHINGTON
Defendant / Appellee:
ELKHART COUNTY SHERIFF, JAMES BRADBERRY, Officer and GRAY BILL, Officer
Bergeron v. Lynn et al
as 3:2023cv50184
Plaintiff:
Adam Bergeron
Defendant:
Jason Lynn, Bill White and Ashley Sanders
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hoskins v. Thielen et al
as 3:2023cv50176
Plaintiff:
Joshua Hoskins
Defendant:
Dallas Thielen, Ali Henson, Mr. Dalke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hoskins v. Thielen et al
as 3:2023cv50177
Plaintiff:
Joshua Hoskins
Defendant:
Dallas Thielen, Mr. Billings, Mr. Long and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
