Cases 41 - 50 of 291
Barlag v. Gladieux et al
as 1:2022cv00408
Plaintiff:
Daniel Cortez Barlag and Daniel Cortez Butcher-Barlag
Defendant:
David J. Gladieux, Sickafoose, C. Ray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Richardson v. Jamison et al
as 1:2022cv05728
Plaintiff:
Cortez Richardson
Defendant:
Odell Jamison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Richardson v. Gaston et al
as 1:2022cv05726
Plaintiff:
Cortez Richardson
Defendant:
King Gaston
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Santmyer v. Cortez et al
as 1:2022cv05636
Plaintiff:
Jamie Santmyer
Defendant:
Cortez and Tom Dart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Indiana State of et al
as 3:2022cv00793
Plaintiff:
Kevin Cortez Brown and Brown
Defendant:
Indiana State of, Ron Neal, Dawn Buss and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Briseno v. Thithi Restaurant Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv04186
Plaintiff:
Antonio Cortez Briseno
Defendant:
Thithi Restaurant Inc., Thi Thi Pham and Tam Nguyen
Guerrero-Cortez et al v. Limrah Inc. d/b/a New Naan on Devon & Grill et al
as 1:2022cv04152
Plaintiff:
Jose Manuel Guerrero-Cortez and Maria Diaz Mojica
Defendant:
Limrah Inc. d/b/a New Naan on Devon & Grill, Ibrahim Mohammed and Limrah Inc. doing business as New Naan on Devon & Grill
Rojas v. Everyaction, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv03712
Plaintiff:
Jorge Alejandro Rojas
Defendant:
Everyaction, Inc. doing business as NGP Van, Stuart E Trevelyan, Actblue LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Cortez, Jr. v. Syngenta AG et al
as 3:2022pq01199
Special Master:
Randi Ellis
Plaintiff:
Raul Cortez, Jr.
Defendant:
Syngenta AG, Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC, Chevron U.S.A. Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
McCoy v. Gunderson
as 2:2022cv00670
Plaintiff:
James Cortez McCoy
Defendant:
Ms Gunderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
