Cases 41 - 50 of 176
Anderson v. Cook County Jail et al
as 1:2018cv08353
Defendant:
Mrzena, John Doe, Director Jones and others
Plaintiff:
Allante N Anderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hill v. Cook County et al
as 1:2018cv08228
Defendant:
Officer Henderson, Detective D. Kimble, Sheriff Gleason and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Patterson v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2018cv07594
Defendant:
Chicago PP Watch Commander, Chicago Police Supt., City of Chicago and others
Plaintiff:
Victor Patterson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Winters v. Lane et al
as 2:2018cv02285
Defendant:
C/O Robinson, Teegarden, Kristen Lane and others
Plaintiff:
Donald Allen Winters
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Venson v. Pork et al
as 1:2018cv05184
Defendant:
W. Nicholas, A. Cabrera, Lt. Coleman and others
Plaintiff:
Kaabar Venson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Franklin v. Pfister et al
as 1:2018cv04478
Plaintiff:
Andre Franklin
Defendant:
Pfister, Orange Crush Commander Art 1, John Doe Orange Crush Commanders and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Galtney v. Emmanuel et al
as 1:2018cv04156
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Galtney
Defendant:
Rahm Emmanuel, City Of Chicago, Eddie Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Maersk Line, Ltd. vs National Air Cargo Group, Inc.
as 3:2018mc00034
Creditor:
Maersk Line, Ltd.
Debtor:
National Air Cargo Group, INC.
Garnishee:
US Transportation Command
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Collins v. The Chicago Police Department et al
as 1:2018cv03382
Plaintiff:
Leeric Collins
Defendant:
The Chicago Police Department, The Chicago Police Department Watch Commander of 18th District, Officer Sandovol and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Simpson v. Medin et al
as 1:2018cv01929
Plaintiff:
Robert Simpson
Defendant:
C Medin, Commander Artl and Randy Pfister
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
