Cases 41 - 50 of 62
GROSS v. LOCKETT
as 2:2011cv00091
Petitioner:
ANDREW GROSS, III
Respondent:
CHARLES L. LOCKETT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
KEYBANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION v. LANDD PROPERTIES, LLC et al
as 1:2010cv00907
Defendant:
LAWRENCE R. GROSS, INDIANA COMMUNITY BUSINESS CREDIT CORPORATION, LANDD PROPERTIES, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
KEYBANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
IN RE: FAILURE TO COMPLY
as 1:2010mc00069
Respondent:
TIMOTHY PAUL ALCORN, PAUL NEJAT ALP, DANIEL BAXTER WANN ALTMAN and others
In Re:
IN THE MATTER OF FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION REQUIREMENTS AND/OR NONPAYMENT OF ATTORNEY REGISTRATION FEES
Adkins et al v. Will et al
as 3:2009cv00510
Plaintiff:
Jerry Adkins, Coralie J Anderson, Bill Barber and others
Cause Of Action: Comprehensive Env Response, Compensation & Liability Act
GROSS v. LUCAS
as 2:2009cv00348
Plaintiff:
ANDREW GROSS, III
Defendant:
LUCAS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2009cv00134
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 626 Job Discrimination (Age)
GROSS V LUCAS, ET AL
as 2:2009cv00257
Plaintiff:
ANDREW GROSS, III
Defendant:
LUCAS and FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gross v. United States Marshal Service et al
as 2:2009cv00218
Defendant:
UNITED STATES MARSHAL SERVICE, HELEN J MARBERRY and FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Plaintiff:
ANDREW GROSS
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
GROSS v. MARBERRY
as 2:2009cv00181
Petitioner:
ANDREW GROSS, III
Respondent:
HELEN J MARBERRY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Gross v. Holden et al
as 2:2009cv00179
Plaintiff:
ANDREW GROSS, III
Defendant:
ERIC HOLDEN
Miscellaneou:
SERVICE LIST
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
