Cases 41 - 50 of 105
Keefe, William et al v. Walker, Scott et al
as 3:2017cv00177
Plaintiff:
William (Jack) Keefe, Bradley J. Schmitz, Malia LaPorta and others
Defendant:
Scott Walker, Brad Schimel, Marquette County Child Support Agency and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Christopher Glass & Aluminum, Inc. v. O'Keefe
as 1:2016cv11532
Plaintiff:
Christopher Glass & Aluminum, Inc.
Defendant:
Thomas O'Keefe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Baines v.Garcia et al
as 1:2016cv05189
Plaintiff:
Keefe Baines
Movant:
Gregory E. Kulis & Associates, Ltd.
Defendant:
N. O Garcia, C.R. Pronek and The City of Chicago
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ellis v. Alexander et al
as 1:2016cv05155
Plaintiff:
Krystal Ellis
Defendant:
Dana Alexander, Barbara West, Robert Klich and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Keller v. Dart et al
as 1:2015cv09890
Plaintiff:
Genio Keller
Defendant:
Tom Dart and Keefe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Corder v. Stegmiller et al
as 1:2015cv09633
Plaintiff:
Eric B. Corder
Defendant:
Robert Stegmiller, Robert Gallas, John O'Keefe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2015cv09354
Plaintiff:
Emmanuel T Williams
Defendant:
City Of Chicago , John D. O'Keefe, John E. Wrigley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vega v. Milwaukee Police Department District 1 et al
as 2:2015cv00896
Plaintiff:
Alfredo Vega
Defendant:
Milwaukee Police Department District 1, Brian O'Keefe, Joseph Nowicki and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
London v. Clarke et al
as 2:2015cv00428
Plaintiff:
Keith London
Defendant:
David A Clarke , Jean DiMotto, J B Van-Hollen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Radcliffe v. Keefe Commisary Network et al
as 1:2015cv02582
Plaintiff:
William Radcliffe
Defendant:
Keefe Commisary Network and Cook County Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
