Cases 41 - 50 of 82
Taylor et al v. Endo Pharmaceuticals Inc., et al
as 1:2014cv04566
Plaintiff:
Laves L. Taylor and Demetric Taylor
Defendant:
Endo Pharmaceuticals Inc. , Prostrakan Group PLC and Does 1-15, Inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv00292
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Taylor v. Hamilton et al
as 1:2014cv01076
Plaintiff:
Demarco L Taylor
Defendant:
Helen Hamilton, Angelica Joyner, . Hastings and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taylor v. Cross
as 3:2014cv00304
Petitioner:
Thomas L. Taylor
Respondent:
James Cross
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Donnawell v. Hamburger et al
as 1:2014cv00981
Plaintiff:
Jan Donnawell
Defendant:
Daniel Hamburger , Christopher B Begley , David S Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Helms et al
as 3:2014mc00001
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
Robert A Helms, Janniece S Kaelin, Deven Sellers and others
Receiver:
Thomas L Taylor, III
TAYLOR v. COLVIN
as 1:2013cv01994
Defendant:
CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Plaintiff:
ETOLIA L. TAYLOR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Brandon Taylor v. USA
as 13-2730
Petitioner - Appellant:
BRANDON L. TAYLOR
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Vose et al v. Bristol-Myers Squibb & Company et al
as 1:2013cv04804
Plaintiff:
Eugene E. Vose , James L. Addington , Harvey Allen, Sr. and others
Defendant:
Bristol-Myers Squibb & Company , Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC , Sanofi US Services Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Taylor v. United States of America
as 3:2013cv00039
Petitioner:
Brandon L Taylor
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
