Cases 41 - 50 of 351
JOHNSON v. RULE
as 2:2023cv00170
Petitioner:
ANTHONY LAMAR JOHNSON
Respondent:
T. RULE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Gipson v. Truitt et al
as 1:2023cv01835
Plaintiff:
Virgil Lamar Gipson
Defendant:
Charles Truit and Charles Truitt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lamar Wilmington v. Tarry Williams
as 23-1582
Petitioner / Appellant:
LAMAR WILMINGTON
Respondent / Appellee:
TARRY WILLIAMS, Warden
PHILLIPS v. REAGLE et al
as 1:2022cv02268
Plaintiff:
JAMES E. PHILLIPS
Defendant:
REAGLE, AKILAH LAMAR, MICHAEL A. GRAY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson, Lamar v. Taylor, Thomas et al
as 3:2022cv00670
Plaintiff:
Lamar Anderson
Defendant:
Capt. Thomas Taylor, Lt. Lucas Brown, CO. Mr. Binish and others
Not Classified By Court:
WSPF Prison Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TAYLOR v. REAGLE et al
as 1:2022cv02169
Plaintiff:
QUENTIN L. TAYLOR
Defendant:
DENNIS REAGLE, CENTURION HEALTH, AKILAH LAMAR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
USA v. Lamar Chapman, III
as 22-3259
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
LAMAR C. CHAPMAN, III
Whatley v. Byran et al
as 4:2022cv04158
Plaintiff:
Lamar Edward Whatley
Defendant:
Nicholas Byran and . Osmundson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bralen Jordan v. Johnny Leonwicsy, et al
as 22-2832
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRALEN LAMAR JORDAN
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHNNY LEONWICSY, Captain, KENNETH DUGDALE, C. HORST and others
Evers Pharmacy Inc et al v. OptumRx, Inc.
as 3:2022cv02156
Plaintiff:
Evers Pharmacy Inc doing business as Dauber Pharmacy, Petersburg Pharmacy, Inc. doing business as Petersburg Pharmacy, Princeville Pharmacy LLC doing business as Princeville Pharmacy and others
Defendant:
OptumRx, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
