Cases 41 - 50 of 112
Loop Spine & Sports Center, Ltd. v. OpenMed, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv02358
Plaintiff:
Loop Spine & Sports Center, Ltd.
Defendant:
John Does 1-10 and OpenMed, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
DEDRICK et al v. SHERIFF DEPARTMENT et al
as 4:2020cv00081
Plaintiff:
BRETT BACHELDER, WESLEY ROBERTSON, AARON SHIRLEY and others
Defendant:
FRANK LOOP, FUREMAN, KEITH HENDERSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Menna et al
as 1:2020cv01585
Defendant:
West Loop Tap, L.L.C. and Matthew Menna
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Lexington Insurance Company, as subrogee of South Loop Development II, LLC v. Johnson Controls Inc et al
as 1:2020cv00630
Defendant:
Johnson Controls Inc and Taco, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Lexington Insurance Company, as subrogee of South Loop Development II, LLC and Lexington Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Scalia v. JJ Gold Coast, Inc.,et al.,
as 1:2020cv00553
Respondent:
JJ Gold Coast, Inc., Sarpinos Loop, Inc., and MJK South Loop, Inc., Illinois Corporations, and Julius Jokimas, an Individual
Plaintiff:
Eugene Scalia
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
JONES v. LOOP
as 4:2019cv00280
Respondent:
FRANK LOOP
Petitioner:
FREDERICK D. JONES, SR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
ROUDENBUSH v. FLOYD COUNTY JAIL et al
as 4:2019cv00278
Defendant:
FLOYD COUNTY JAIL, CAPT FURMAN and FRANK LOOP
Plaintiff:
RODNEY ALLEN ROUDENBUSH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brian Scalf v. Frank Loop, et al
as 19-2878
Defendant / Appellee:
FRANK LOOP, Sheriff, JIMMY WARD and NURSE MELANIE
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRIAN K. SCALF
BRYANT v. FURMAN et al
as 4:2019cv00199
Defendant:
COURTNEY, MEDICAL WARD, JOHNSON and others
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER M. BRYANT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PARKS v. WASHINGTON et al
as 4:2019cv00188
Defendant:
FLOYD CO. JAIL, ROY WASHINGTON and FRANK LOOP
Plaintiff:
DOUGLAS ANDREW PARKS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
