Cases 41 - 50 of 4,487
Reed v. Davis et al
as 2:2024cv02230
Defendant:
. Denault, . Memenga, Michael Downey and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Reed
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Loreal USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv09287
Defendant:
L'oreal USA Products, Inc., SoftSheen-Carson LLC,, Strength of Nature, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Sandra Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Davis v. First Financial Bank
as 2:2024cv00350
Respondent:
First Financial Bank
Petitioner:
Bridget B. Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgment
Davis v. Pepper et al
as 3:2024cv00808
Defendant:
Pepper, Lindsey Kowalski, Peppers and others
Plaintiff:
Clarence T Davis and Clarence Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Buchanan, Terrence v. Ziegler, Annette et al
as 3:2024cv00681
Respondent:
Ellen K. Berz, Will R. Davis, Mark A. Neuser and others
Petitioner:
State ex. rel. Terrence Buchanan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Davis v. Loreal USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv08613
Defendant:
Loreal USA Products, Inc., Loreal USA, Inc., Strength of Nature, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Harriett Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Matthew Burgess v. Lessie Bates Davis Neighborhood House Inc., et al
as 24-2622
Defendant:
GARY GASTON and LESSIE BATES DAVIS NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW BURGESS
Davis v. AFAM Concept, Inc. d/b/a JF Labs, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv08532
Plaintiff:
Patricia Davis
Defendant:
SoftSheen-Carson, L'Oreal USA and AFAM Concept, Inc. d/b/a JF Labs, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Davis v. Avlon Industries, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv08538
Plaintiff:
Shequila Davis
Defendant:
House of Cheatham LLC,, Avlon Industries, Inc., SoftSheen-Carson LLC, and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
