Cases 51 - 60 of 637
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03539
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
JS et al v. Vineyard Church et al
as 1:2023cv03689
Petitioner:
JS, BS, Jorel Shophar and others
Respondent:
Vineyard Church, Belton Wayne Sims, Jason Hooper and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MARTIN v. BONNER et al
as 2:2023cv00267
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY MARTIN
Defendant:
BONNER, RUTH MARY SIMS, SARAH CLARKE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00862
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01191
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Roundtree v. Muhammad et al
as 1:2023cv03040
Plaintiff:
Lonnial Roundtree
Defendant:
Jeelan Muhammad, Susan Shebel, Meyers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garcia v. Jeffreys et al
as 1:2023cv01187
Plaintiff:
David Garcia
Defendant:
Rob Jeffreys, Sherry Benton, Clayton Stephenson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sims v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2023cv00382
Plaintiff:
Tiffiny Sims
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Not Classified By Court:
General Counsel SSA (Court use only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02573
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Roger Sims-Bey v. Jason Jester, et al
as 23-1779
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROGER SIMS-BEY
Defendant / Appellee:
JASON JESTER, JUSTIN HAMMERS, CERRYLE HINTHORNE and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
