Cases 51 - 60 of 144
Battle v. Kink et al
as 3:2018cv00798
Plaintiff:
Jovan Miguel Battle
Defendant:
Warden Kink, Counselor Camp, Counselor Inbolden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BATTLES v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2018cv01078
Plaintiff:
NANCY A. BATTLES
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Battle v. Illinois Department Of Corrections et al
as 1:2018cv02320
Plaintiff:
Jovan Miguel Battle
Defendant:
Illinois Department Of Corrections, NRC Lutient Givens, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Battle v. Faulkner et al
as 1:2018cv02222
Plaintiff:
Jovan Miguel Battle
Defendant:
Bruce Faulkner, Randy Pfister, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Battle v. Pfister et al
as 1:2018cv02225
Plaintiff:
Jovan Miguel Battle
Defendant:
Randy Pfister, Statesville Mailroom Department, John/Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Battle v. Abbott Laboratories, Inc.
as 3:2018cv00427
Plaintiff:
Angelique Battle
Defendant:
Abbott Laboratories, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Battle v. Randy et al
as 1:2018cv01011
Plaintiff:
Jovan Miguel Battle
Defendant:
Pfister Randy, Officer Romann, Officer Gardner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Battle v. Illinois Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2018cv00637
Plaintiff:
Jovan Miguel Battle
Defendant:
Illinois Department of Corrections, Statesville NRC Mental Health Administration, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Love v. Melvin et al
as 1:2017cv01552
Plaintiff:
Nolan Love
Defendant:
Melvin, . Kennell, . Battles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Battle v. Smoot et al
as 3:2017cv01165
Plaintiff:
Jovan Miguel Battle
Defendant:
K. Smoot, L. LeCrone, K. Hamm Ersley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
