Cases 51 - 60 of 241
REED v. SEVIER et al
as 1:2021cv03108
Plaintiff:
JASON A. REED
Defendant:
MARK SEVIER, CENTURION HEALTH, GEO CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BROOKS v. WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES, INC. et al
as 1:2021cv03109
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW S. BROOKS
Defendant:
WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES, INC., WEXFORD OF INDIANA, LLC, JONES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. THE GEO GROUP et al
as 1:2021cv03011
Plaintiff:
KORY T. JOHNSON
Defendant:
THE GEO GROUP, GEO GROUP EMPLOYEES, SAMMIE JOSEPH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MARSHALL v. GEO GROUP INC. et al
as 1:2021cv02862
Plaintiff:
AUGUSTUS MARSHALL
Defendant:
GEO GROUP INC., SEVIER, K. GRINSTEAD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. GEO GROUP INC et al
as 1:2021cv02856
Plaintiff:
TROY L. SMITH
Defendant:
GEO GROUP INC, WEXFORD OF INDIANA LLC, CENTURION MEDICAL SERVICES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HARRIS v. GEO GROUP, INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2021cv02815
Plaintiff:
COTY SCOTT HARRIS
Defendant:
GEO GROUP, INCORPORATED and NEW CASTLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILKINSON v. WEXFORD MEDICAL SERVICES et al
as 1:2021cv02731
Plaintiff:
DAVID W. WILKINSON
Defendant:
WEXFORD MEDICAL SERVICES, CENTURION MEDICAL SERVICES, GEO GROUP INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CAIN v. GEO GROUP INC. et al
as 1:2021cv02556
Plaintiff:
CHRISTIAN CAIN
Defendant:
GEO GROUP INC., SEVER, SEYE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CROCKETT-BERRY v. GEO GROUP, INC. et al
as 1:2021cv02539
Plaintiff:
JAVON CROCKETT-BERRY
Defendant:
GEO GROUP, INC., JONES, WORTH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JONES v. HANNLEY et al
as 2:2021cv00335
Plaintiff:
ROBERT C. JONES
Defendant:
AMY HANNLEY, CRAIG CANNIFF, KENNETH STEVENS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
