Cases 51 - 60 of 673
REDDEN v. HARRISON CO ASSESSOR et al
as 4:2023cv00056
Plaintiff:
JOHN REDDEN
Defendant:
HARRISON CO ASSESSOR and SHERIFFS DET
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00051
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00516
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
MCCLURE v. SMITH et al
as 2:2023cv00144
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER MCCLURE
Defendant:
NICK SMITH, KIM JENNINGS, MICHAEL GREGORY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00510
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Harrison v. Kijakazi
as 1:2023cv01731
Plaintiff:
Toiya M. Harrison
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
FRANCIS v. PLASSE et al
as 2:2023cv00113
Plaintiff:
DONALD FRANCIS
Defendant:
JOHN PLASSE, CHARLEY FUNK, CASEY LEE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HARRISON v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2023cv00317
Plaintiff:
ABRINA D. HARRISON
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY and KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00989
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Foremost Insurance Company of Grand Rapids, Michigan v. Copi et al
as 3:2023cv03033
Plaintiff:
Foremost Insurance Company of Grand Rapids, Michigan
Defendant:
David Copi, Gail Copi, Gail's Home Daycare and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
