Cases 51 - 60 of 162
HAYDEN et al v. COOK INCOPORATED et al
as 1:2017cv04443
Defendant:
COOK INCOPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Plaintiff:
CAROL HAYDEN and JAMES HAYDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Deckers Outdoor Corporation v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A"
as 1:2017cv07871
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A", Anthony McFarland, stingray-rv.fr and others
Plaintiff:
Deckers Outdoor Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Ybarra v. Hayden et al
as 3:2017cv00798
Plaintiff:
Randy Russell Ybarra
Defendant:
Zack Hayden, Misty Haddix and Monty Fisher
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hayden v. Pfizer, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv07444
Plaintiff:
Curtis B. Hayden
Defendant:
Pfizer, Inc. and Pharmacia & Upjohn Company Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hayden v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2017cv03583
Plaintiff:
Kendrick Hayden
Defendant:
City Of Chicago, Ofc. McHale and Ofc. McDermott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HAYDEN v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2017cv00209
Defendant:
CORIZON HEALTH INC. and DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY HAYDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Medical Malpractice
HAYDEN et al v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2017cv00341
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Plaintiff:
GEORGE M. HAYDEN and JOSALINE HAYDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Schulz, Craig v. Pagel, Darin et al
as 3:2016cv00845
Plaintiff:
Craig Schulz
Defendant:
Darin Pagel , Shane Vanderwaal , Tom Hayden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hayden v. United States of America
as 1:2016cv00256
Petitioner:
Taurean L Hayden
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
