Cases 51 - 60 of 73
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 13-2344
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
MARTIN v. COLVIN
as 1:2013cv00366
Defendant:
CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Plaintiff:
PHYLLIS J. MARTIN
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00016
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Merchant et al v. Napolitano et al
as 1:2012cv01983
Plaintiff:
Shariff Merchant , Nadia Aslam , FNU Aslam and others
Defendant:
Janet Napolitano , Janice L Jacobs , William J Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 11-3670
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv50346
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003
Gibbs, et al. v. New Ashley Stewart, Inc.
as 1:2011cv03071
Plaintiff:
Sharon Gibbs, Marilyn Branch, Keisha M. Fulton and others
Defendant:
New Ashley Stewart, Inc. and Urban Brand, Inc. doing business as Ashely Stewart
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
BRANTLEY v. Thomas et al
as 1:2010cv01445
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY BRANTLEY
Defendant:
CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS, et.al., INDIANAPOLIS METRO POLICE DEPARTMENT, J. MARTIN and others
I.M.P.D:
A. TRITTIPO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv04004
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Garth Richardson v. Court Of Claims of the State of Illinois et al
as 1:2010cv01299
Plaintiff:
Israel K. Garth Richardson
Defendant:
Court of Claims of the State of Illinois, Jessie White, Ex- Official Clerk of Court and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
