Cases 51 - 60 of 124
Mohammed v. State of Illinois et al
as 1:2020cv03482
Defendant:
Kimberly Verest, Daniel Guerin, Paul Leong and others
Plaintiff:
Abdul Mohammed
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Mohammed v. State of Illinois et al
as 1:2020cv01220
Defendant:
Legal Services Corporation Inc., Hamdard Center for Health and Human Services Inc., Timothy McJoynt and others
Plaintiff:
Abdul Mohammed
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Elkins, Jr. v. Carlson et al
as 3:2020cv50205
Defendant:
Jane Doe 1, Michael Remmers, Amber Allen and others
Plaintiff:
Timothy W. Elkins, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Riley El v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv02975
Defendant:
John Doe #5, John Doe #4, John Doe #1 and others
Plaintiff:
William D. Riley El
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miller v. Wexford Health Source, Inc. et al
as 3:2020cv00446
Defendant:
Dina Paul, Steve Meeks, Nurse Ward and others
Plaintiff:
Jimmie Dale Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cotton v. Watson et al
as 3:2020cv03111
Defendant:
Passat Health Care Services, . Smith, John Trusewych and others
Plaintiff:
James Cotton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Winston, Shomas v. Kron, Frederick et al
as 3:2020cv00367
Defendant:
Wisconsin Department Of Corrections, Jane Doe 1, Jane Doe 4 and others
Not Classified By Court:
WSPF Prison Facility
Plaintiff:
Shomas T. Winston
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mohammed v. The State of Illinois et al
as 3:2020cv50133
Defendant:
Andrea Szczepanski, Paul Leong, Saima Azfar and others
Plaintiff:
Abdul Mohammed
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Feliciano v. Dennyson et al
as 3:2020cv00247
Defendant:
Jane Doe 1, Jane Doe 4, Jerry Dennyson and others
Plaintiff:
William Feliciano
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ezebuiroh v. Doe 1 et al
as 3:2020cv00203
Plaintiff:
Jerry B. Ezebuiroh
Defendant:
Jane Doe 2, Jane Doe 3, Jane Doe 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
