Cases 51 - 60 of 69
Love v. Wexford Health Source et al
as 1:2014cv06743
Plaintiff:
Abdul Love
Defendant:
Wexford Health Source, Michael Hamke, Anna McBee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Zumut v. Godinez et al
as 1:2014cv06479
Plaintiff:
Wesam Zumut
Defendant:
S A Godinez, Michael Lemke, Obaisi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Patterson et al v. McCarthy et al
as 1:2014cv04561
Plaintiff:
Victor L. Patterson
Defendant:
Garry F. McCarthy, Michael O. Cronin, Dept of Police admistrater and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Dowdy et al
as 3:2014cv00511
Plaintiff:
Maurice Jackson
Defendant:
Dowdy, Lt. Hughes, Luehr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dorko v. Williams et al
as 3:2014cv03007
Plaintiff:
Frank E Dorko, Jr
Defendant:
Tarry Williams, Render, David Delaporte and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lockhart v. HSBC Finance Corporation et al
as 1:2013cv09323
Plaintiff:
Eloise Lockhart
Defendant:
HSBC Finance Corporation, HSBC Mortgage Corp, Household Finance Corporation III and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sroga v. Doe et al
as 1:2013cv04946
Plaintiff:
Kevin Sroga
Defendant:
Jane or John Doe, Chicago Police Officers, S&S Department for the City of Chicago and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Walker v. Pennock et al
as 3:2013cv03079
Plaintiff:
Frankie N Walker, Sr
Defendant:
Wanda Pennock, Jane or John Doe, Thomas G Ivey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. Darren et al
as 1:2013cv02171
Plaintiff:
Kennado K. Taylor
Defendant:
Sgt. Darren, Sgt. Carock, Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mays v. Illinois Dept Of Corrections et al
as 1:2012cv08516
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Mays
Defendant:
Illinois Dept Of Corrections, Kelly, Woods and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
